RAJASTHANI VETERANS

RAJASTHANI VETERANS
RAJASTHANI VETERANS

Friday 26 February 2016

PIB on OROP - Reply of RM to Shri Devajibhai G Fatepara and others in Lok Sabhain on 26 Feb 2016

One Rank One Pension Scheme – PIB
Press Information Bureau
Government Of India
Ministry Of Defence
26-February 2016
Detailed instructions along with OROP tables on implementation of OROP have been issued on 3.2.2016. Considering the requirement for implementation of “One Rank One Pension”, the expenditure ceiling for Defence Pensions in BE 2016-2017 has been increased from Rs.69,876 crores to Rs.82,332.66 crores. Government has received representations from various Ex-Servicemen Associations and beneficiaries regarding anomalies and their dissatisfaction with the order of OROP scheme.
One member Judicial Committee has been appointed on 14.12.2015 to look into the anomalies arising out of implementation of OROP. The Judicial Committee will submit its report in six months.
The following instructions have been issued to Pension Disbursing Agencies(PDAs) for effective implementation of OROP:
• The arrears on account of revision of pension from 01.07.2014 be paid in four equal half yearly instalments. However, family pensioners including those in receipt of Special/Liberalized family pension and all Gallantry award winners shall be paid arrears in one instalment.
• Any required information, if not available in record may be referred to Pension Sanctioning Authority(PSA) concerned who will provide the requisite information from the available records within 15 days to the PDAs.
• In case of any doubt, PDA may immediately take up the matter with nodal officers of respective PSAs, the details of which shall be notified by Pr. CDA(P) Allahabad in their implementation instructions.
This information was given by Defence Minister Shri Manohar Parrikar in a written reply to Shri Devajibhai G Fatepara and others in Lok Sabha today.
Source: PIB

MOD Guidelines on Fixation of OROP

MOD GUIDELINES ON CLARIFICATIONS SOUGHT BY PCDA (P) ON FIXATION OF OROP TABLE

1.Clarification sought by PCDA (P):- It may be clarified whether average of minimum & maximum pension is to be determined separately for three Services and the highest among them be allowed or average of minimum and maximum pension is to be determined with reference to entire data of three services.

Guidance provided by MoD:- Issue may be dealt in reference to suggestion at para 1 above. Average of minimum and maximum may be determined with reference to entire data for three Services.

2. Clarification sought by PCDA (P):- Where rates of proposed pension at lower qualifying service is higher than the rates for higher qualifying service in same rank/group? 

GUIDANCE BY MOD:-In case of such anomalies, pension of higher qualifying services would be stepped up to the level of pension of same rank/group with lower qualifying service.

3.Clarification sought by PCDA (P):- Where proposed rates of pension in higher ranks is lower than the rates in lower rank(s) with same qualifying service? 
GUIDANCE BY MOD:- In case of such anomalies, pension of higher rank/group with same qualifying service may be stepped up to the level of pension of lower rank(s) with identical group) with same qualifying service.

4. Clarification sought by PCDA (P):- Where retirees for any rank/Group is not available for lower qualifying service but available after certain length of service? 

GUIDANCE BY MOD:-Where data in a rank is available but the same is not available for certain lower qualifying service, pension for lower service may be determined allowing cut of 3% (compounded) for each completed year to the first rate available for any qualifying service in the particular rank/group. The reduction will be subject to protection with rates of pension determined for lower rank(s)/Group(s).

5. Clarification sought by PCDA (P):- From 1.9.2008 onwards, JCOs/ORs are getting 3 financial upgradations in scale of higher rank under MACP scheme. These upgradations are allowed after 8/16/24 years. However, rank of the personnel doesn’t change. A confirmation is required whether these data of pensioners is to be considered with reference to the rank held or is to be taken with reference to grade pay drawn after financial upgradation. 
GUIDANCE BY MOD:-Specific cases from data of 2013 available be segregated with reference to GP and not with reference to rank last held. Thus, personnel who retire with higher grade pay due to financial upgradation may be considered with higher rank for determining revised pension.

6. Clarification sought by PCDA (P):- In terms of recommendations of CSC-2012, JCO/OR pensioners are allowed pension based on highest notional pay across the 3 services. A confirmation required whether the proposed pension is to be determined with reference to entire data across three services for both JCO/OR and Commissioned Officers or otherwise? 

GUIDANCE BY MOD:- The present policy for pre-2006 JCO/OR retirees viz., across three services may continue. As the pre-revised/revised pay structure for Commissioned Officers across the Services were same, such dispensation was not considered for them earlier. It is now proposed that pension for JCOs/ORs/Offrs may be determined with reference to entire data across the three services.

7. Clarification sought by PCDA (P):- A methodology needs to be adopted for determining proposed pension for ranks/groups where there are no retirees in calendar year 2013. 

GUIDANCE BY MOD:- When data in a rank is not available, protection in pension be allowed with reference to lower rank(s). Where data in Gp X for a rank is not available, pension may be determined by adding Rs 700 (50% of X Gp pay)in Gp Y Pension subject to protection with rates of pension determined for Gp X in lower rank.

8. Clarification sought by PCDA (P):- Methodology be adopted for certain types of pension viz Liberalised family pension/2nd life awards, where cases are not available in calendar year 2013 data or data available is very less.
GUIDANCE BY MOD:- CSC-2012 established linkage between rates of all kind of family pension with rated of service pension in respect of JCO/OR pensioners may continue. Similar dispensation may also be adopted for rates of family pensions in respect of Commissioned Offrs.

9. Clarification sought by PCDA (P):- For post 2006 disables cases, rates for disability/war injury element linked with pay last drawn which is reduced pro-rata for lesser percentage of disability. Methodology to finalise rates of these awards for each rank/group and qualifying service may be required. Rates of disability/war injury element be linked with rates of revised retiring/service pension. 

GUIDANCE BY MOD:- The rates of disability element shall be 60% of retiring/service pension in each qualifying service for 100% disability. The rates of war injury element shall be 120% of retiring/service pension (discharge cases) and 200% of retiring/service pension (invalidment cases) in each qualifying service for 100% disability.

10. Clarification sought by PCDA (P):- Method for revision of PSU absorbees who had opted for 100%commutation of pension as policy for 100% commutation is withdrawn from April 1996 and no such retirees exists in 2013. 
GUIDANCE BY MOD:- Pension of such retirees be revised based on revised pension determined for regular ranks. However, existing restored amount of pension shall continue as the methodology for the same has been finalised with reference to Hon’ble Supreme Court judgment.

11. Clarification sought by PCDA (P):- As per existing formula applicable topre-2006 retires, pension is determined up to maximum terms of engagement for JCO/OR and up to 33 years of service for Commissioned Officers despite of the fact whether they have rendered service beyond that limit. Confirmation required whether the same has to be continued in proposed formulation of OROP or proposed pension of each personnel retired in calendar year 2013 irrespective of qualifying service has to be notified to allow this benefit for past pensioners. 

GUIDANCE BY MOD:- Rates of pension may be determined up to the terms of engagement only and maximum pension determined for rank/group shall be allowed for higher QS. However, in case of officers of the rank of Major General and above which gets their rank at a higher qualifying service, first available rate of pension of qualifying service with 33 years or more may be treated as rates for 33 years of service subject to pro-rata reduction for lower qualifying service.

12. Clarification sought by PCDA (P):- While reviewing the data of post- 2006 retirees at different points of time in the past it has been observed by Ministry that out layers should be removed from the data to determine revised pension. Methodology in this regard would be reqd. 
GUIDANCE BY MOD:- It is suggested that out layers be excluded by identifying cases getting benefit of higher pension due to various Court decisions extra increment/out of turn promotions earned by individuals, cut in rates of pay/pension due to punishments, direct entry in higher ranks. PSAs may identify minimum/maximum cases for each rank/group /qualifying service from their data base and get it confirmed from respective Record offices/Pay Account offices to exclude these cases from relevant data.

13. Clarification sought by PCDA (P):- As per the announcement made by the Government for OROP, personnel retire voluntarily/on his own request are to be excluded from these benefits. Confirmation would be required whether cases of voluntary retirement/retire on own request has to be excluded from the data of 2013 before determining revised pension.


GUIDANCE BY MOD - Decision awaited

Source- Aerial View

Wednesday 17 February 2016

PROJECTED POINTS FOR JUDICIAL COMMISSION : OROP ANOMALIES


ANOMALIES : FIXATION OF ONE RANK ONE PENSION (OROP)
TABLE NO 7 BETWEEN X AND Y GP JCOs AND OTHER RANKS OF
ARMY, AF AND NAVY


1.  24 Years (X Gp) Nb Sub Pension increased 10.12%. However, 24 Years (Y Gp) Nb Sub pension increased  only 0.50% (Appendix A).

2.     While in service Difference between X Gp and Y Gp pay is Rs 1400 (X Group Pay only).  Therefore, difference in basic pension between X Gp and Y Gp should be Rs 1400/2 = Rs 700/- (50% of X Group Pay) whereas in some cases difference is more than Rs 1700/-  between  ( X and Y Gp) (Appendix A). 

3.     In some point of bracket of service, pension increment  is  0.50% whereas six months  previous/past service bracket of same rank  pension hike is 4 to 8% more (Appendix B).

4.      Even some rank not crossed two figure increment under scheme of OROP and some category have been given four figure increment. Most depressed category under OROP scheme is Nb Sub (Y Gp) who have  given pension increment @ Rs 28/47/63/67/79 per month  between 24-28 yrs service bracket (Appendix B).
  
5.     NO change in disability pension of soldiers invalided out upto five years of service. Service element increased 47 to 65% but disability element increment is 0% (Appendix C).

6.     X Gp Hony Nb Sub's Pension is equal to X Gp Nb Sub But Y Gp Hony Nb Sub's pension is not equal to Y Gp Nb Sub between 24 Years to 26 years bracket of service. (Appendix D and E).     

7.     Huge gap in same rank and same length of service is not justifiable and also against ethos of “One Rank and one Pension” for same rank and same length of service.

8.    Genuine anomalies should to be looked into to make the OROP Indian Armed Forces Invincible and gap between X Group and Y Group JCOs/OR's pension should be removed completely or kept as per ratio (50% of X Gp Pay)  to avoid any further gap/fraction between Jawan’s of X and Y Group at a later stage as all X and Y Group soldiers are now ex servicemen and Non Effective.

                                                                                                             

                                                                                                           
                                                                                                            Appendix A
                                                                                                            (Refer to Para 1 to 2)




                                                                                                           


                                                                                               
                                                                                                            Appendix B
                                                                                                            (Refer to Para 3 to 4)

TWO FIGURE INCREMENT : MOST DEPRESSED CATEGORY

                                                                       
                                                                                                            Appendix C
                                                                                                            (Refer to Para 5)


                                                                           


           
                                                                                                            Appendix D
                                                                                                            (Refer to Para 6)

 NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HONY NB SUB AND NB SUB  (X GP)
(24 YR TO 26 YR)

                                                                                                           
                                                                                                           
                                                                                                            Appendix D
                                                                                                            (Refer to Para 6)

Rs 1100/- DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HONY NB SUB AND NB SUB  (Y GP)
(24 YR TO 26 YR)


Thursday 11 February 2016

Anomalies OROP Fixation


ANOMALIES OROP FIXATION

  • 24 yr X Gp Hony Nb sub's Pension is equal to 24 yr X Gp Nb Sub But 24 Yr Y Gp Hony Nb Sub's pension is not equal to 24 yrs Y Gp Nb Sub.    
  • 24 Yrs XGp Nb Sub Pension increased 10.12%. However, 24 Yrs Y Gp Nb Sub Pension increased only 0.50%.  

  • While in service Difference between X Gp and Y Gp is pay is Rs 1400 (X GP PAY ONLY).  Therefore, diff in basic pension between X Gp and Y Gp should be Rs 1400/2 = Rs 700/- only whereas in some cases diff is more than 1500/-  between  ( X and Y Gp).  Huge gap in same rank and same length of service is not justifiable. 
  • In some point of bracket of service pension incr is  0% whereas six months incr/decr service bracket of same rank  pension hike is 4 to 8% more.
  • NO change in disability pension of soldiers invalid out upto five years of service.  Service element incr  47 to 65% but disability element    incr is 0%.



X v/s Y



Monday 8 February 2016

OROP Arrears Maj to Maj Gen at a Glance

Ordinary Family Pension Arrears

Note :-  Old as per Circular 502.              New as per Circular 555

               If new pension is less, existing pension protected. 

               Calculation/typing error may pl be intimated for rectification.



ESM who rendered less than 15 years service and invalided out was receiving disability pension (disability element+service element) but after his death disability element ceased.  However, widow/NOK is eligible for service element as ordinary family pension as per service bracket of their husband. 


Friday 5 February 2016

1396